Published Friday
April 7, 2006
Ginsburg: Foreign rulings instructive
BY BILL HORD
WORLD HERALD BUREAU
LINCOLN -
To a round of applause, Associate Justice Ruth
Bader Ginsburg said
Friday that it would
be "a
bad idea" to allow Congress to overturn
U.S. Supreme Court decisions.
The applause
came from an appreciative audience at the
University of Nebraska College of
Law in Lincoln,
where more than 500 students, local judges,
lawyers and administrators listened to
her 40 minute
lecture on the value of an independent
judiciary.
Ginsburg, 73, was guest lecturer for
the Roman L. Hruska Institute for the Administration
of Justice
at the law college. She is the third
Supreme Court justice to give the institute's annual
lecture.
She was appointed in 1993 by
President Bill Clinton. With the retirement of
Sandra Day
O'Connor, Ginsburg
is the lone woman on the high court.
Ginsburg
said the independence of the U.S. judiciary has
survived past attempts
to
exert legislative
control but is once again being challenged.
"In some political circles," Ginsburg
said, "it
is fashionable to criticize and even
threaten federal judges who decide cases without
regard to what
the home crowd wants."
She cited
various proposals that, if successful,
would restrict the
independence
of federal
judges.
Congressional leaders, Ginsburg
said, have suggested that Congress hold
the judiciary
accountable
for unpopular decisions. The House
Judiciary Committee
considered creating an office of
inspector general for the judiciary
to investigate
allegations of judicial misconduct.
Ginsburg
said she was troubled by another congressional
proposal
to
keep federal
courts from referring
to foreign legal decisions. She
said justices examine
foreign legal cases but do not
consider them binding.
Another
troubling proposal, she said, would allow a two
thirds
vote of
Congress to
overturn a judicial
decision.
She said the legislative
branch's ultimate weapon against judges
was impeachment.
"History bears out that Congress is unlikely
to employ the nuclear weapon impeachment
against judges who decide cases in a way that the home crowd does not
want," Ginsburg said.
In
217 years, the House of Representatives
has impeached
13 judges, all
for illegal behavior, not
for making
unpopular decisions,
Another
serious threat, she said, is the "political
hazing" of Supreme
Court nominees during the
confirmation
process.
She said attempts
to uncover hidden ideological
agendas,
rather than
examine qualifications,
started with
Clinton nominees and have
continued with nominees
of President
Bush.
Ginsburg's topic resonated
with the law students.
"It was very exciting hearing from a sitting
Supreme Court justice," said
first year law student
Kristin Farwell of Kearney. "The
entire theme made it a
very remarkable address."
Christie
Higgins, a law student
from Grand Island,
was impressed
that
Ginsburg made
her points about
judicial independence by
giving historical examples
of restrictions
in other
countries such as Russia,
Ecuador and Uganda.
Earlier
in the day, Ginsburg answered questions of a
mass media law class
during a 45 minute
appearance
at the College of Journalism
and Mass Communications.
She
told the journalism students that her own
confirmation process
in 1993
was "dull" by
today's standards.
"No one was trying to trip me up," she
said.
Reprinted with permission from the Omaha World
Herald. |